Sunday, January 27, 2019
Ethical judgements Essay
Our entire life is a continuous process of gaining and retaining information, expanding our noesis as individuals. Most population swing quite a bit of time in their childhood age in school finding, taking in familiarity that has been produced. As a species military mans capture produced a wealth of knowledge in a variety of paths. However thither comes a time where you abide to revere what extent quite a little would go to, to produce knowledge. Where is the line? When atomic number 18 we doing slightly function ethic whollyy wrong? All of these questions bring up a nonher question, do moral philosophy get in the way of producing knowledge? The humanities and natural sciences argon two areas of knowledge that deal a hardening with ethics. The humanities are a very free area of knowledge in with people are allowed to express themselves, the natural sciences require a lot of experimentation. In my opinion, knowledge is very valu up to(p), and the production of it s hould be a priority if the feed is honest.The arts are a of import source of knowledge, producers of art pass to try to convey a message through their artwork. Art comes in more or less(prenominal) different forms, ranging from visual arts to music and even literary arts. Throughout all forms closely of art there are lessons infix in the art piece, or at least messages conveyed through the art. Similarly, most art contains some form of censorship, artists are not allowed to touch on certain topics. Even if artists decide to make art that touches on moot or different topics, their art is typically not accepted in society and does not receive any(prenominal) publicity.Again, this is the case with almost all art, however for the purpose of this essay I am loss to counselling on literary art. An example that is very prevalent in my attend is the ban of _The guard of Negroes_ by Lawrence Hill. A dutchman named Roy Groenberg wrote a letter to Lawrence Hill. In the letter he wrote that a group of people in the Netherlands were going to burn Hills book because in contained the word black in the title (Hopper). _The Book of Negroes_ is an award winning book that is close to the life of an 11 year-old girl who is kidnapped in a village next Segu in Africa, and displace to North Carolina to be a slave. The book continues to see the reader almost her life as a slave (Hill)._The Book of Negroes_ is widely considered as very moving and a book that conveys segmentationical messages (Hopper). Unfortunately, because of the title it was misconceived as a book that was critical of African-Americans. Groenberg was the totally mortal to act on his feelings, however that does not mean he was the altogether person to see this book as negatively directed at African-Americans. _The Book of Negroes_ was belike misconceived by many more people erect because of the inclusion of the word negro in the title. Unfortunately, society has made many ethical judgements about the word negro which are usually confirm but in this case prevent people expanding their knowledge (Hopper). This peerless of many examples, in which an ethical judgement limited methods available in the production of knowledge.This brings up the question in my mind, why do people shy away from certain words? An attempt to find the settle lead me to the Theory of Knowledge diagram, more specifically the ways of knowing. 1 way of knowing that intrigues me is language, this seems to answer my question. Language is a very mesomorphic way of knowing, as words can be very powerful. at that place are handful of words in the english language that are not spoken because of how powerful they are. It seems to me that because of this some words are not tolerated even if the context is appropriate. Which sort of explains why The Book of Negroes received some criticism. It almost makes the criticism understandable, and I can begin to justify Groenbergs actions.Like I said before, al most all art forms draw artwork that is not socially accepted, and up to this point Ive only discussed literary art. However in my personal life I have learned about art not being accepted, when it comes to hip-hop music. I regularly listen to hip-hop music and it is a very definitive part of my life. In the one- eighth grade for a social studies syndicate I had the opportunity to play a song in class as part of a project. This for me was especially difficult because a lot of hip-hop music is not completely suitable for a eighth grade class setting. Even though I had found a couple of songs that were perfect for what I needed, but had a little overly much profanity.I completely understand that there are some inappropriate elements to hip-hop music that are not the best thing for a class room environment. However, I believe by the eighth grade students have developed a level of maturity, and should be able to listen to hip-hop music. All that needed to happen was for my class mates to disregard any profanity and see the song for what it truly is. Similarly, people should have looked historical the title The Book of Negroes and read the book to see it for its value. respectable judgments are as prevalent in the arts as they are in the natural sciences. From stem cell research to animal testing, there are a plethora of examples for natural sciences. The arts are as much about entertainment as they are gaining knowledge, or peradventure even more. On the other hand the natural sciences is almost exclusively about gaining new knowledge and improving what is already known. In this age, developments in natural sciences are nearly only about human advancement. Whether is medically or discovering new things.I am going to mainly centre on how various countries, such as Argentina, the United States, Russia, Iran and France, tested their blank equipment. From the mid 1940s all the way to 2013, the mentioned countries have sent shrink froms into home (Gray). Before leaders were confident enough to send humans into seat, they sent monkeys into space to see how their equipment fared. As expected, most of these monkeys died horrible deaths in charge with no way of knowing what is happening or any way to help themselves (Gray). The most notable instances were the first few monkeys in space. In 1948 NASA sent a rhesus monkey named Albert 39 miles into the air in a rocket. Albert died of suffocation mid flight, however NASA sent another monkey in the air named Albert II. Albert II survived the flight but died due to a parachute malfunction (Gray).When I discussed the Book of Negroes I reached a deduction that gaining knowledge is more important than ethical issues. However, when discussing NASA monkeys it is much harder to decide. This is because lives are at stake, although they are not human lives it is still hard to count about something demise for space research. Majority of people carry that sending monkeys into space is wrong. How is it that NASA can design equipment to go into space, but can not hold a machine that can detect air pressure and atomic number 8 levels.Again, understanding this point of view is much easier but the theory of knowledge diagram came to my mind again. In the ways of knowing there is emotion, and that is likely the main way of knowing affecting people when they imagine monkeys dying for space research. It is easy to create an emotional bond with an animal as tricky as a monkey, and most people can agree monkeys are cute. When reacting on emotions people reach rash conclusions. Which I think can be applied here, I am curious what the reaction would be if NASA tested with uglier or at least less cute animals. What if NASA sent warthogs into space? This is a situation when I personally abominate to play devils advocate, however if I was an astronaut in the 1940s I would certainly not go into a space rocket. I have absolutely nothing against monkeys, but if I were forced to make a decision between a monkey dying and a human dying I would choose the monkey, without hesitation.In conclusion, knowledge is very valuable and has been something humans have cherished through the ages. The production of knowledge has been indispensable to the advancement of the human race. Under most circumstances in the arts and natural sciences, the production of knowledge does not require a study sacrifice, just a small loss or temporary discomfort. thither are times in which it is not worth the sacrifice to learn something. However the vast majority of circumstances provide a reasonable loss for the production of knowledge. Overall, I believe knowledge and the production of knowledge is extremely valuable and should be a priority when it comes to he arts and natural sciences.Works CitedGray, Tara. A Brief History of Animals In Space. NASA. NASA HQ, 02 Aug 2004. Web. 16 Sep 2013.Hill, Lawrence. The Book of Negroes. Toronto, Ontario, Canada HarperCollins, 2007. Print.Hoppe r, Tristin. Dutchman threatens to burn The Book of Negroes. National Post. National Post, 10 Jun 2011. Web. 16 Sep 2013. .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment