Compare the presentation and content of the article in the Mirror and the article in the Guardian

Communities in Britain argonnt spendd to gunman culture. However, what is gun culture? Although gun crime is increasing, is it the questionable glamorous culture that is fuelling it? On the opposite hand, is it the society we live in and our also-ran to instil morals and principles in our children?In this essay I am going to compargon how a tatter and the website of a broadsheet give births and reports this issue. I shall be looking at the different presentational devices and visual images mapd, lecture and the structure and context of the material.Firstly, the difference in media is immediately clear. The Mirror, a sail paper, has a big picture of Ice Cube the rap operative spread across both pages as its briny focal layer with the heading Dont let medicinal drug take the rap. In note, the Guardians website has very dinky in the way of pictures and has the text as the main focal evidence with a small heading. As this is a broadsheet, I would expect it to be much the said(prenominal) in the tangible paper. On the other hand, two(prenominal) papers maintain used puns in their headings. The Mirror uses Dont let harmony take the rap and the Guardian uses Bullet points.Both headlines be used for the same reason- to catch the proof referees attention and to inform the reader what the name is about. Furtherto a greater extent, in the tabloid paper the picture of Ice Cube opposeing a gun promoting his film is very similar to the star of Trevor Nelson in the main article, since they are both wearing black leather jackets and black hats. Implying that both of them are involved in the same sort of lifestyle. The Guardian does non use such presentational devices to make the article more appealing to the reader but it does lay down a small picture with the words sub frenzy in Britain on a red back earth suggesting blood.Both papers expect a return of articles relating to the main pillow slip but have them displayed in very different way s. The Mirror has a number of small columns relating to the main editor in chiefial, which are spread around the orthogonal of the two pages, Dealing with various aspects of gun culture, so as to hold the readers attention the info has been broken down into digestible bites. On the other hand, it may distract the readers attention from the main article. However, the Guardian has a number of hyperlinks to related articles so in that location are no other actual pieces on the same page as the Bullet points article. This once once more shows the difference in media and how the two papers are able to present their articles.At the bottom of the main article in the Mirror there is a section asking the public to keep open in if confederacy life has affected them. Here the Mirror is inviting readership participation, much as TV shows such as Jerry Springer and Oprah, this invites an on going discussion, which may appropriate the paper with a good story. They are also probably expectin g ballyhoo artist replies. The Guardian does not use this since its editorship probably thinks its readers have the confidence to write in anyway.Since the presentation of the two articles is so different and the fact that one paper is a tabloid and the other is a broadsheet, you would expect the contented of the two articles to be very different.First of all, the difference in carve up sizes is immediately clear. The Trevor Nelson piece in the Mirror is mostly single declare paragraphs. On the other hand, the paragraphs in the Guardian are slightly yearner with three to four sentences in a paragraph. Apart from this, the articles are not very different, both articles are against blaming music for gun crime, it is wrong to reprove gun crime and violence on music, and To doom gun violence on music is to simplify and squeeze the problem. This in the Mirrors case is hostile to the picture of a rap star holding a gun. The Mirrors main article is supposed to be Trevor Nelsons vie ws on the subject written by a reporter. On the other hand, Willber Willberforce, a programs editor at 1Xtra, expressing his views on the subject, writes the Guardians main pieceBoth articles are mainly opinion and have little or no facts in them this is a sentence from the Mirrors article. all a kid has to do to prove he is the baddest boy in the area is to get a rumour going hes got a gun.This is a sentence from the Guardians piece.Music is in everybodys house, in everybodys car, but does not regularize peoples morals.Furthermore, the language in both articles is quite informal if you pardon the pun, would be not to give them any ammunition. since the Guardian is a broadsheet, a more formal approach to the subject would have been expected. Moreover, the difference in the aim of vocabulary used by both papers is little or none this is an extract from The GuardianIt is a social problem that has split of contributing factors. To blame gun violence on music is to distort and overs implify the problem.In contrast, here is a sentence from the MirrorNelson is diamond that it is wrong to blame gun crime and violence on music and says the fault lies in the heart of society.Here you can see that the direct of vocabulary is the same.Although, both papers use people in the music industry to write their articles the way two papers choose to do this is very different. The Mirror does this by getting a reporter to interrogate Trevor Nelson and accordingly write an article expressing his views. On the other hand, The Guardian gets the Programmes editor at 1xtra to write his own article expressing his views this enables him to speak directly to the reader rather than through the filter of a reporter. Moreover, the way the two pieces are structured is very different The Bullet points article starts of by talk about how gun crime has got worse, gun violence has undoubtedly got worse. because goes on to discussing the reasons why people timbre the need to carry guns, a nd then it blames the media for the way they portray urban musicians, Megaman visits a hospital, but thats not newsworthy. Finally, the source chooses to end the piece talking about how most popular urban artists dont actually talk about guns and violence in their songs, the biggest change urban acts today are basically singing love songs. In contrast, the Trevor Nelson article in the Mirror begins by talking about how music is not to blame for gun crime and violence but society, the fault lies at the heart of society. Then the article goes on to talk about how what is casualty with urban music is no different to football hooliganism but this is no different to the hooligan days when yobs used football as vehicle for their aggression.Lastly, the article ends talking about Trevor Nelsons first hand put through of gun crime at a club he was DJ-ing at.I was devastated. To know someone got killed at a party where I was DJ-ingI think the Trevor Nelson article makes its points most ef fectively it is better structured and is rise thought out. Moreover, Nelson has more credibility because he has given an MBE for bringing urban music to the UK, whereas Wilberforce is less well known. On the other hand, due to the readership of both papers it is not very lightly that the readers will know who either Nelson or willberforce are. The Bullet Points article in the Guardian did not have a main point on why not to blame music, it seemed to push the blame to the media. In addition, it said that the most popular urban artists sing love songs, in spite of the fact that Eminem is one of the biggest selling urban acts and one of the most controversial due to the nature of his lyrics. Furthermore, in this piece there are a number of questions asked by the generator that are left unansweredIf there were no records glorifying guns, would they still feel they needed to carry a gun?OrWhere do the influences on peoples behaviour begin and end?In conclusion, the way in which the two papers covered the issue was very different from each other, although amazingly they did have their similarities in vocabulary and language. Moreover, there were clearly some advantages and disadvantages in the medium chosen to report the subject, such as for the Guardian, the internet enabled them to use a number of hyperlinks to satellite article but the reader would have to know the web address to get to their site first. In contrast the Mirror could guarantee that the reader would at least glance at each article whether they chose to read it or not but because they were victimisation paper they had a limited amount of space available for articles.